← Back to Glossary
Customer Acquisition Cost

LTV
CAC.

Updated

LTV:CAC is the single most-cited subscription health metric, and for good reason — it captures the entire economics of the business in one number. A customer worth 3x what they cost to acquire is a sustainable business. A customer worth 1x what they cost is no business at all.

The ratio explained

LTV:CAC = Customer Lifetime Value ÷ Customer Acquisition Cost

If LTV is $600 and CAC is $200, your LTV:CAC is 3:1 — a customer is worth 3x what you paid to acquire them. That 3x covers acquisition cost plus your operating margin plus your growth budget plus profit.

The standard benchmarks

  • LTV:CAC ≥ 3:1 — healthy. Acquisition is paying for itself with margin for everything else.
  • LTV:CAC ≈ 2:1 — tight. Working but limited room for operating cost or growth investment.
  • LTV:CAC ≈ 1:1 — break-even on acquisition. You are buying revenue at cost.
  • LTV:CAC ≥ 5:1 — possibly under-investing in growth. You could likely acquire more aggressively and still be healthy.

These are heuristics, not laws. The right ratio depends on margin, payback period, and growth stage.

Where LTV:CAC misleads

  1. LTV estimates are usually optimistic. Most LTV models assume current retention rates hold forever. They rarely do. If you are forecasting LTV from short cohort data, the ratio will look better than it really is.
  2. CAC is often understated. Salaries, tools, and content production frequently get left out. Real CAC is usually 20–50% higher than the "ads only" number.
  3. Aggregate ratios hide segment problems. A 3:1 average can hide a 1:1 paid social cohort and a 6:1 organic cohort. The aggregate is healthy; one channel is destroying value.
  4. Time horizon matters. 18-month LTV vs. 36-month LTV give very different ratios. Pick a horizon and stick with it.

How to improve LTV:CAC

Two halves of the ratio, two directions to work:

Most subscription businesses get more leverage from raising LTV than lowering CAC — retention compounds across every cycle, while CAC reductions are bounded.

Payback period: the companion metric

LTV:CAC tells you whether acquisition is profitable. Payback period tells you how quickly. A 3:1 ratio with 36-month payback is harder to run than the same ratio with 12-month payback because cash flow tightens. Most healthy subscription businesses target 6–12 month payback alongside their LTV:CAC.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a good LTV:CAC ratio?

3:1 or better is the standard healthy benchmark. 2:1 is tight, 1:1 is break-even on acquisition before any operating cost, 5:1+ may indicate under-investment in growth.

Is LTV:CAC the same for SaaS and ecommerce?

The ratio target is the same — 3:1 or better is healthy in both. The absolute LTV and CAC numbers differ by orders of magnitude (SaaS is much higher both ways), but the health benchmark is consistent.

How do I calculate LTV:CAC?

Calculate LTV (typically ARPU × subscription lifespan, or ARPU ÷ monthly churn rate). Calculate CAC (total acquisition spend ÷ new customers, fully loaded). Divide the first by the second. Compare to 3:1.

Why is my LTV:CAC ratio looking great but my business is struggling?

Three common reasons: LTV is optimistic (forecasting current retention forever), CAC is understated (missing salaries and tools), or payback period is too long (the ratio is healthy but cash is tight). Stress-test all three.

Start Growing Your Subscription Revenue

Join 5,000+ Shopify merchants using Joy Subscriptions. Free to install, no credit card required.

  • Free 14-Day Trial
  • No Credit Card Required
  • Cancel Anytime